Harmonii Founder Dashboard

Harmonii Network · Academic year 2025–2026

Portfolio overview

All partner schools · Founder access only

Partner schools

284

Total participants

3.6

Network average

School C

Highest performer

ICS +0.4

Most improved

Network average index

3.6

/ 5.0 across all schools

Struggling educators

~20 educators across network

Most common challenge

Sustainability

Lowest dimension in 3 of 4 schools

Top network strength

Purpose

Highest dimension in all 4 schools

Total thriving educators

33%

~93 educators across network

School performance table Ranked by overall index

Network trend All schools · 3 cycles

Dimension comparison — all schools Network view

Network-wide reflection themes Cross-school patterns

Themes appearing in 3 or more schools — highest strategic priority

Portfolio intelligence Founder view

⚠

Sustainability systemic — network-wide

Sustainability is the lowest or joint-lowest dimension in 3 of 4 schools. This is a structural sector challenge, not a school-specific issue. Position Harmonii's sustainability framework as a system-wide solution.

↓

Renewal declining in large schools

Schools with 80+ staff show Renewal scores 0.6 points below smaller schools. Scale appears to erode recovery culture. Consider a Renewal-specific workshop module for large school contracts.

✦

Purpose consistent strength across network

Purpose averages 4.3 network-wide. This is a sector asset — educators remain mission-driven. Use this in your sales narrative: Harmonii helps schools protect and build on this intrinsic motivation.

School overview · Academic year 2025–2026

International Community School

Dubai, UAE · IB PYP / MYP · Assessment cycle: March 2026 · Phase: Primary & Secondary

Participants

94%

Completion rate

3.7Overall wellbeing index

Purpose 4.4

Highest dimension

Sustainability 2.8

Lowest dimension

Mean score

3.7

/ 5.0 overall average

Dimensions at risk

Renewal 2.9 · Sustainability 2.8

Thriving educators

34%

30 of 87 participants

Leadership respondents

23%

20 with leadership roles

Struggling educators

5 participants — urgent attention

Priority intelligence

⚠

Sustainability critical — 2.8

The lowest-scoring dimension across the school. 38% of staff scored below 2.5 on workload manageability (S1). Recommend a structured conversation with SLT about sustainable workload design.

↓

Renewal below threshold — 2.9

Disconnection from work (R2) is the weakest item at 2.4. Secondary phase scores significantly lower than Primary (2.5 vs 3.4). Phase-specific renewal strategies recommended.

✦

Purpose strength — 4.4

Exceptionally strong. 91% of staff scored 4 or 5 on P1 (meaningful work). This is an anchor to build upon in the leadership debrief — reinforce and protect this asset.

Dimension heat map School average

Harmonii wellbeing wheel School aggregate

Dimension scores vs 5.0 maximum

Staff segmentation By wellbeing band

Segmentation by phase

Reflection themes Open response analysis

Most frequently cited themes across all 4 qualitative questions

Leadership vs classroom Score comparison

Wellbeing index over time This school · 3 cycles

Individual participants Anonymised for demo

Benchmark comparison vs Harmonii Network average

This school

3.7

Overall index

Harmonii network average

3.6

Across all partner schools

Ready to generate the Harmonii Executive Report™ for this school? All data below is pre-populated from assessment responses.